The Supreme Court, Trump, Biden and the Election Explained

first_imgJustices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr., Neil M. Gorsuch and Brett M. Kavanaugh said they would have granted a stay blocking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision. On the other side were Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and the court’s three-member liberal wing: Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who joined the court on Oct. 27, did not take part in the decision not to fast-track the case. A court spokeswoman said Justice Barrett had not participated “because of the need for a prompt resolution” and “because she has not had time to fully review the parties’ filings.” Pennsylvania officials have instructed county election officials to segregate ballots arriving after 8 p.m. on Election Day through 5 p.m. three days later. That would as a practical matter allow a ruling from the Supreme Court to determine whether they were ultimately counted.Justice Alito’s statement in the Pennsylvania case echoed an earlier concurring opinion by Justice Kavanaugh in a voting case from Wisconsin. Justice Kavanaugh also said that state legislatures, rather than state courts, have the last word in setting state election procedures.Taken together, the Oct. 17 deadlock and statements from four justices suggest that Justice Barrett could cast the decisive vote if the Pennsylvania dispute holds the key to the election. Updated Nov. 4, 2020, 12:06 p.m. ET Late last month, the justices refused a plea from Republicans in the state to fast-track a decision on whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had acted lawfully.- Advertisement – The U.S. Supreme Court has not hesitated to block orders from federal judges that sought to alter state rules for conducting elections. Rulings from state courts present more difficult questions because the Supreme Court generally defers to them in cases concerning interpretations of state law, while the Constitution empowers state legislatures to set the times, places and manner of congressional elections.In a statement issued when the court refused to speed the Pennsylvania case, Justice Alito, joined by Justices Thomas and Gorsuch, criticized his court’s treatment of the matter, which he said had “needlessly created conditions that could lead to serious postelection problems.”“The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has issued a decree that squarely alters an important statutory provision enacted by the Pennsylvania legislature pursuant to its authority under the Constitution of the United States to make rules governing the conduct of elections for federal office,” he wrote, adding that he regretted that the election would be “conducted under a cloud.”“It would be highly desirable to issue a ruling on the constitutionality of the State Supreme Court’s decision before the election,” Justice Alito wrote. “That question has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the federal Constitution.”But there was not enough time, he wrote. Still, Justice Alito left little doubt about where he stood on the question in the case. The court’s refusal to move more quickly came a little more than a week after it deadlocked, 4 to 4, on an emergency application in the case on Oct. 19. – Advertisement –center_img Should the vote in Pennsylvania have the potential to determine the outcome in the Electoral College and should those late-arriving ballots have the potential to swing the state — two big ifs — the U.S. Supreme Court might well intercede.The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ordered a three-day extension for ballots clearly mailed on or before Election Day and for those with missing or illegible postmarks “unless a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that it was mailed after Election Day.” WASHINGTON — President Trump promised early Wednesday morning to ask the Supreme Court to intervene in the election. “We’ll be going to the U.S. Supreme Court,” he said. “We want all voting to stop.”The first statement was premature. The second did not make sense.- Advertisement – The Supreme Court decides actual disputes, not abstract propositions, and then only after lower courts have made their own rulings. While there have been countless election cases filed around the nation, it is not clear which of them might reach the court in the coming days.But one candidate is already on the court’s docket. Last month, the court refused to put a case from Pennsylvania on a fast track, but three justices indicated that the court might return to it later if need be.As far as voting is concerned, it stopped on Election Day. But some states allow votes cast by mail on or before Election Day to be counted if they are received up to several days afterward. In Pennsylvania, for instance, the state Supreme Court extended the deadline for receiving ballots from Election Day to three days later. “The provisions of the federal Constitution conferring on state legislatures, not state courts, the authority to make rules governing federal elections would be meaningless,” he wrote, “if a state court could override the rules adopted by the legislature simply by claiming that a state constitutional provision gave the courts the authority to make whatever rules it thought appropriate for the conduct of a fair election.” – Advertisement –last_img read more

Ontario Reign’s Martin Frk breaks Zdeno Chara’s hardest shot record in AHL skills competition

first_imgWhen his opportunity came, Frk showed the world that his slap shot is more than worthy of the NHL. He hammered the puck 109.2 mph to set a professional record, sending the hometown crowd at Toyota Arena into a frenzy.NHL PLAYOFF PICTURE: Breaking down potential first-round matchups at the All-Star breakMartin Frk beats Zdeno Chara’s hardest shot record with an insane 109.2 mph shot in the AHL skills competition pic.twitter.com/bbFuopquHj— Brady Trettenero (@BradyTrett) January 27, 2020To put this in perspective: Chara, who took the 108.8 mph shot in 2012, stands 6-9 and weighs 250 pounds. Montreal Canadiens captain Shea Weber, who won this weekend’s NHL Hardest Shot competition (106.5 mph), is 6-3 and weighs 229. Frk is 6-1, 205, and he bested the tallest player in NHL history by 0.4 mph.Frk told reporters after the event he used a stick with a 70 flex number to take the shot. A hockey stick’s flex affects how stiff the stick is; general guides to stick flexes say as a starting point to determine a stick flex they find comfortable, players should divide their weight (in lbs). Based on that rule, Frk’s stick flex should be closer to 100 — meaning he uses a more flexible stick to shoot than many of his peers likely do. Boston Bruins captain Zdeno Chara held hockey’s record for hardest shot for eight years; he unleashed a 108.8 mph slap shot at the 2012 NHL All-Star Skills Competition. On Sunday, AHL forward Martin Frk bested that number.Frk is currently employed by the Los Angeles Kings, but he has played much of this season for their AHL affiliate, the Ontario Reign. His excellent season with the farm team (30 points in 33 games) earned him a place in the AHL’s All-Star Weekend in Ontario, Calif., and an opportunity to participate in the minor league’s own hardest shot contest. “I still can’t believe I actually beat [Chara], because he can absolutely rip it,” Frk said. “Maybe I can get a chance to talk to him — it’s just a really cool moment for me.”The AHL’s Western Conference ultimately won the skills competition, which is similar to the NHL’s, 18-15. The AHL All-Star Challenge will be played Monday.The Kings signed Frk, 26, as a free agent last July.last_img read more